Politics of Hooliganism!!…

First it was the Shiv Sena who used to beat up people who bought roses on Valentines day.

(only a single case of the 100 others)

Then came MNS promising to protect the common man from Shiv Sena’s violence….but ended up making a mess of it…navnirman you see.
Now we have Sri Ram Sene thrashing women for dancing ‘indecently’ in Public bars.
I dont know what these dudes mean by ‘indecent’.
Yesterday MNS dudes vandalised properties worth rs.50000 in Mumbai University..why??
because the guard was rude to them!!!
When are we seeing an end to this ‘no one dare touch us’ attitude of these people.
i read in TOI today that MNS can be banned under National Security Act.
why can be banned?
why not will be banned?
I hope it happens…

4 thoughts on “Politics of Hooliganism!!…

  1. Sri Ram Sena are a bunch of pathological lunatics just like some feudal goons seeking violence and attention in media.

    If hooliganism, street violence, moral policing and taking law into their hands are signs of taliban, then let us see who all qualify to be termed as Taliban.

    1) Mamita Benerjee dragged a SP MP by collar in Indian parliament. Has not she taken law into her hands and was as violent as Sri Ram Sena in the middle of India Parliament?

    She is female Taliban according to the definition applied to “Sri Ram Sena”.

    2) Both Renuka Choudhury and Uma Bharati are accused of publicly slapping men (we have seen videos), they both are taliban as well.

    So, what moral authority Renuka has got? He herself is partly responsible for harassment, arrest of 1,23,000 women with out investigation under one single IPC.

    She needs attention, which her father or bf never seemed to have given.

    3) Women’s organisations attacked arrack sellers and husbands in south India, they are also taliban.

    Banning liquor is taken from south Indian feminist text books only.

    If liquor is injurious to social life in rural India, then it is equally injurious to social life in urban India as well. One guy being drunk killed 4 people just 3 km from my home in Bangalore.

    4) Couple of women’s organisations broke furniture in Delhi High court opposing whistle blower justice JD Kapoor’s 2003 statement that “Dowry law is misused”. A lot of misery would have been averted if these Taliban were arrested and punished severely in 2003 itself.

    They are also Taliban.

    5) Sri Ram sena called the girls prostitutes.
    At 20% of 1,23,000 women were threatened about false cases of “prostitution” in Indian police stations when they were arrested under 498a.

    If Sri Ram Sena is Taliban, then Indian Police is also Taliban. Ban Indian Police.

    The Sri Ram Sena are just like children in comparison to the violent behaviour shown by Indian Feminists, Indian police and women’s organisations.

    There is no difference between women’s organisations and Sri Ram Sena. Both want to oppose “drinking” by beating up the sellers and customers. Both are Taliban.

    1) If a man drinks, he is a drunkard.
    If a female drinks, then she is liberal.

    2) Drinking in Pub is social service.
    Drinking Arrack in village is criminal activity.

    3) Arrack sellers have to be attacked.
    Pub owners have to be given Ashok Chakra.

    Only Urban morons have right to drink and murder people on road.

    What a double standard?

    Sri Ram Sena has to be banned, because they are Taliban.

    Before that ban all other hardened Taliban, who slap men in public, attacked arrack shops, broke furniture in courts, lied and mislead the country.

    Ban Renuka, ban Mamita, BAN AIDWA.
    BAN Indian police, for calling innocent women prostitutes.


    If terrorist Taliban Sri Ram Sena and extortinist police and taliban women’s organisations are not banned, then people must be allowed to take law into their hands and beat up all these terrorists.

    Some 20 women are beaten and molested in Mangalore.

    The crimes committed by Indian police and UNIFEM funded feminists on Indian women (also men) are much bigger. Ban them all.


    If a male MP dragged a female MP by collar in the parliament, has society reacted in the same casual way?

    If a male MP or politician slapped a female in public view, has the society reacted casually?

    Crime has no gender.

    The social double standards are very clear.
    Female criminals get away, where as male criminals are put in jail.

    Today, being a female taliban is fashionable. After slapping men, these bitches are giving sermons on civilised behaviour.

    Save Indian family

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s